Vantage Point

J has already said pretty much what there is to say. This movie is a stinker. Still, here's my 2 cents.

Dennis Quaid, Sigourney Weaver, Forrest Whitaker, and a bunch of terrorist looking actors come to cash their checks. This movie is really bad and has so many things wrong with it it's hard to figure out where to begin. Let's do a quick recap; The US president (Jimmie's borther from History of Violence but giving a much more boring and sedate performance) is in Spain to give a speech, a terrorist threat is intercepted, so instead of the real president giving the speech it's his double. Guarding the double is Dennis Quaid, an experienced secret service agent who last year got shot protecting the pres but is now back on the job and is understandably nervous. The double gets shot, the real pres gets kidnapped and the whole thing is foiled by an annoying little girl that likes to play in traffic. Now the kicker is we get to see these events unfold from seven different points of view, seven 'vantage points' if you will. We see it from the POV of the terrorists, innocent bystander I look like I'm going to cry all the time Forrest Whitaker, Dennis Quaid, the president guy, Sigourney Weaver in a Television control room, some random Spanish cop, and so on. Which kind of sounds cool, but it's not cool, not cool at all, it's just lame. To begin with if you remove the different points of view concept and just lay out the plot of the thing it's totally ridiculous and unbeleviable. Double agents, super duper prescient terrorists, super duper secret ops trained terrorists, Dennis Quaid is always at the exact right place at the right time, it's dumb and cliche at every turn. But it gets worse, you have to watch the dumb cliches over and over. Each point of view reveals a bit more of the story but after it's played out the movie rewinds and you have to sit through stuff you already saw again. Because Dennis Quaid is the focus (star? is Dennis Quaid a star?) of the film each 'vantage point' has to feature him, so unfortunately we get to see him make the same phone call more than once. Why? That's boring. Stupidly he's one of the first vantage points presented, so we basically know the whole story from the central characters POV right from the beginning. I could care less what the periphery characters saw, just get on with it. It's like watching Star Wars up to the moment in the cantina scene where pig face gets his arm chopped off, then the movie rewinds and we watch pigfaced man's day until he gets to the cantina and we watch him again interact with the leads and gets his arm chopped off again. Who cares; get on with Star Wars.

What Worked:

There's people getting shot and explosions and that's always neat. There's a car chase and cars get smashed up pretty good.

Gipes :

This thing is such a fiasco it's hard to list them all. The boring sequence right from the top in the televesion control room (one of the 'vantage points') which features a tired and confused Sigourney Weaver.

How about the fact that there's a huge bomb explosion in a public place but no one seems to really get hurt. It's so sanitary it's offensive to every person that has lost a limb or had their face blown off by a bomb.

Forest Whittaker, all of Forest Whittaker, every single frame of Forest Whittaker.

Was it better than Dungeons and Dragons?

Yes. There is no part in DD worth watching, in this at least the car chase scene is something and I must admit I wanted to see how the thing was going to end and play out (I was sorely disappointed with how it did mind you) I couldn't care less how DD was going to end.

Mediocroty Scale:

A less than mediocre effort all around

Food.

We had some kind of blue Kool-Aid and thankfully it didn't kill us and tasted great and refreshing. Some kind of lime tortilla chips; look that lime powder shit doesn't belong on anything so stop putting it on stuff it makes it taste gross. And of course melted Nacho Cheese is an old favorite and it was good minus the lime flavour.